« Sandicor Strikes Again | Main | On Every Corner »

Monday, September 15, 2008 at 12:33PM

More on VP


Kelly chimed in with an update on the condo deposits - turns out that the $5,000 went towards a 5% non-refundable deposit.

Here's the link to a short update:

http://www.voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2008/09/15/survival/463vpbuyer091008.txt


Posted on Monday, September 15, 2008 at 12:33PM by Registered CommenterJim the Realtor | Comments6 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (6)

Two years late on delivery and these people think they are locked in? Jeez, they deserve to lose money.

September 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterRob Dawg

It boggles my mind that anyone would pay a non-refundable deposit or sign a full purchase contract on an uncompleted building that did not specify an end date and a provision that allowed cancellation of sale with a full refund of all deposits if the property wasn't ready to occupy on schedule. Who would be stupid enough to buy a home with an open-ended escrow period?

September 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterGeneK

They have a lot to learn from all the airlines raking in discounts and cash from Boeing over late deliveries.

September 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterBDiego

Reminds me of the time I was ordering some furniture and they wanted a deposit. The sales guy assured me it would arrive in three weeks. So I said fine, let's just write it in the contract that if it wasn't there by three weeks I'd get a full cash refund of the deposit. Three weeks? Did they say three weeks? All of a sudden they were sure it would arrive in five weeks, max, or I'd get a store credit refund. We argued for a while and eventually wrote it in that it had to be there in eight weeks or I'd get a full cash refund of the deposit. I reminded them of this after seven weeks, and what do you know, the store owner's frazzled wife showed up at my place at 7 PM on the last day with the furniture on a trailer. Heh.

September 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterDwip

Just a tangent on MLS..A lot of listings on redfin are missing some key info like a full address, square footage, attached/detached, short sale (the most common gripe for me), or major flaw (like a giant sinkhole next door). Would save everyone a lot of time if they embraced technology and enforced accuracy on MLS.

September 15, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterBDiego

I joined the yahoo forum for VP, and now I get emailed when someone leaves a message - great.

Here is the first one, in response to Kelly' article:

Low Income Housing where Burger King was?
Was this disclosed in our paperwork?

Units and 95% Financing
As a former employee of a a sub-prime lender I can tell you even at our peak we would not lend on the following criteria:

-95% LTV (I don't plan on putting anymore money down)
-40% Owner Occupancy (Based on that article 60% of the units will be vacant)
-Mixed Use
-High Rise Condo

Who is planning on offering financing? Wells Fargo (Meridian) is not
going to honor those prequal letters?

Glad to be part of the group and I look forward to your response. By
the way found a good article about the Florida market in the WSJ:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122091760356512479.html

September 15, 2008 | Registered CommenterJim the Realtor

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>